Skip to main content
Glama
vktr93
by vktr93
README.md
<h1 align="center">Review Metric MCP Server</h1>

<p align="center">
  <strong>Connect Claude to the world's most advanced 15-agent scientific peer review pipeline.</strong>
</p>

---

# 🔬 What is Review Metric?
Review Metric is a powerful AI tool designed for researchers, academics, and scientists. By installing this MCP server, you give Claude the ability to securely submit your local `.docx` manuscripts to a sophisticated 15-agent pipeline that rigorously analyzes your work for methodological flaws, novelty, and literature alignment.

## 🎥 See it in Action
![Review Metric Claude Desktop Demo](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vktr93/reviewmetric-mcp/main/demo.gif)

### ✨ Key Features
* **Multi-Agent Rigor:** Your manuscript is analyzed by 15 specialized AI agents, simulating a real-world peer review panel.
* **Comprehensive Scoring:** Receive a definitive 0-100 quality score to gauge your readiness for journal submission.
* **Zero Data Retention:** Your unpublished work is completely secure. We enforce strict zero-data retention, meaning your research is **never** used for AI training.
* **Local File Access:** Claude can securely read manuscripts directly from your computer without you having to copy/paste massive documents into the chat.

---

#### 🚀 Installation for Claude Desktop

To install this tool, simply add the following configuration to your `claude_desktop_config.json` file. 

*(Note: You will need your personal API key from the Review Metric web dashboard https://www.reviewmetric.it.com/).*
```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "review-metric": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["reviewmetric-mcp"],
      "env": {
        "REVIEWMETRIC_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here"
      }
    }
  }
}
```

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.vktr93/reviewmetric-mcp -->

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Only two tools with clearly distinct purposes: one is for submission, the other for checking status. No overlap or ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (submit_manuscript, check_analysis_status), with clear and descriptive names.

Tool Count2/5

With only two tools for a described 15-agent AI pipeline, the tool count feels too thin for the apparent scope, lacking intermediate or management tools.

Completeness2/5

The tool surface is severely limited, covering only submission and status checking. Missing are operations such as listing runs, retrieving full reports, or managing analyses.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues