Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to crypto-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive access to Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) JSON-RPC methods for querying blockchain data, executing smart contract calls, and interacting with any EVM-compatible network including Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, and more. Enables users to check balances, analyze transactions, estimate gas, retrieve logs, and perform blockchain operations through natural language.
      19
      9 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query on-chain data across EVM chains like Base, Optimism, Avalanche, Celo, and Arbitrum, including balances, transactions, gas, and smart contract interactions.
      33 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with any EVM-compatible blockchain through natural language, supporting token swaps, cross-chain bridges, staking, lending, governance, gas optimization, and portfolio tracking across networks like Ethereum, BSC, Polygon, Arbitrum, and more.
      100
      30 npm
      41
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: block retrieval, balance queries, transfers, signing, simulation, etc. No two tools overlap in purpose; even similar actions like sending native vs token are clearly differentiated by asset type and description.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_block, send_native, sign_message). The verbs are uniform and the structure is predictable, making it easy to infer tool functionality from the name.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 13 tools, the server covers a broad yet focused set of crypto operations (reads, writes, signing, simulation) without being overwhelming. This count is well within the optimal range for a domain-specific MCP server.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers essential read/write operations, ENS resolution, signing, and simulation. Minor gaps exist, such as token approval (required for ERC-20 transfers) and event log retrieval, but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues