mcp-agent-collaboration
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-agent-collaboration
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Agent Room, enabling AI agents to join shared meeting rooms and collaborate with humans via tools like room_listen and room_task_*.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local MCP server that provides shared, real-time context across multiple AI agents via WebSocket and MCP resource notifications, enabling collaborative workspaces, memory, tasks, and messaging.11 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server that enables multiple AI agents to collaborate through a shared, concurrency-safe memory space. It supports advanced search, full CRUD operations, and automatic backups to facilitate asynchronous communication between agents.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for inter-agent communication. Gives multiple Claude Code sessions a shared message board, agent registry, and orchestration layer — backed by a cloud relay so agents can coordinate across machines, repos, and teams.845 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI coding agents to communicate, share state, and coordinate work in real time via MCP tools or REST API.44 npm8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceThis MCP server acts as a message broker for AI agents, enabling them to register, discover each other, form persistent squads or ad-hoc teams, and communicate via point-to-point messaging, RPC, or pub/sub. It persists state in SQLite and offers 26 MCP tools for agent, squad, team, and message management.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: topic lifecycle (create, join, leave), messaging (send, read, check_in), and listing (topics, members). check_in is a convenience combination but its description clarifies its dual role.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (create_topic, join_topic, send_message, read_messages, list_topics, list_topic_members). Minor phrasal verb 'check_in' still fits the style.
Eight tools cover the domain of topic-based collaboration without redundancy or bloat. Each tool serves a distinct function and the count is well within the ideal range.
The surface covers topic creation, joining/leaving, messaging, and listing topics/members. A delete_topic operation is missing but might be intentionally omitted for ephemeral in-memory topics, so minor gap only.