Skip to main content
Glama
GTM MCP Server

GTM MCP Server

by vivz-git

Related Servers

Alternatives to GTM MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and write CRM data—companies, contacts, opportunities, tasks, and interactions—through MCP, with OAuth and provenance tracking for every value.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with multiple CRM systems through a unified set of MCP tools, such as finding contacts, accounts, and deals, while supporting mock, REST, and vendor-specific backends.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely call enterprise MCP tools with tenant-scoped RBAC, human approvals, audit logging, and multi-tool workflows across customer, order, document, and ticket data.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables teams to govern agent tool access with function-level allow-lists, credential modes, and audited execution, while exposing permitted MCP tools through a unified endpoint with search and execute functions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover, execute, and inspect actions across business systems through three compact MCP tools, backed by server-side policy, single-use human approvals, and durable idempotent execution that prevents duplicate side effects.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP-native CRM backend for AI agents, enabling customer, opportunity, note, follow-up, and pipeline health management through 15 MCP tools.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The server_info tool has a clear and singular purpose, so disambiguation is trivially perfect.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool is named server_info, which follows a clear noun_noun pattern. With only one tool there are no inconsistencies to evaluate, so naming is internally consistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    A server titled 'GTM MCP Server' would be expected to expose a range of GTM operations, but it exposes only a single information reporting tool. This falls at the 'too few' end of the scale for the apparent scope.

    Completeness1/5

    The server provides no tools for actual GTM management—no operations for tags, triggers, variables, containers, or any data modification. It only reports capabilities, leaving the domain severely uncovered.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessSyncing