delete_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states 'Remove' and 'free its resources,' which implies permanence, but it does not explicitly state that the operation is irreversible, nor does it mention what happens if the clip_id is invalid or if the clip is currently referenced elsewhere. This leaves important side effects undisclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that immediately states the action and outcome. Every word earns its place, and there is no redundant or vague phrasing. This is exemplary concision.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation with one parameter and an output schema, the description covers the core behavior. However, given zero annotations and zero parameter documentation, it lacks details on irreversibility and the exact meaning of clip_id. While the task is simple, the description misses opportunities to make the interpretation unambiguous, so it is only minimally adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter, clip_id, with no description (0% schema coverage). The tool description does not mention clip_id at all, so it adds no meaning beyond the schema's bare type declaration. The agent must infer that clip_id references the clip to delete, which is not explicit.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Remove' with the resource 'clip from the registry' and the outcome 'free its resources.' This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like load_video or export_clip, which perform creation/export operations. No ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_clips or get_clip_info. There is no mention of prerequisites, such as ensuring the clip is not in use, or exclusions. The agent is given no context to decide between this and other registry-modifying tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.