Skip to main content
Glama
vitron-ai

alethia-mcp

Official
by vitron-ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to alethia-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • sagaz-mcp

      BabyKuramaDev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables transparent MCP proxying with a hash-chained effect ledger, classifying agent actions by reversibility, enforcing approval gates, and dry-run previews of sessions.
      MIT

    • mcp-policy-gateway

      jcorrego
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables policy-governed MCP interactions with deterministic authorization, tenant isolation, minimized PII exposure, and human approval gates for sensitive mutations, while producing structured audit events.
      3
      MIT

    • turnstile

      Lekh007
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces default-deny policies, budgets, and tamper-evident audit logging for MCP tool calls before they reach upstream servers.
      -

    • veor

      winterbim
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a governed execution boundary for AI agents, enforcing deterministic policy, one-shot human approvals, and signed receipts for MCP tool effects.
      MIT

    • io.github.AAH20/agent-action

      AAH20
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that gates agent tool calls by normalizing intent, denying unknown/unattended destructive actions, and requiring HITL prove approval for high-risk operations. It maintains an append-only hash-chained Action Ledger and exposes gate_check and ledger_verify tools without ever executing tools.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: executing tests, compiling, monitoring, UI control, safety override, capturing state, JS query, audits, session export, parallel execution, demo server, test proposal, safety assertion, and cockpit control. Even related tools like audit_wcag and audit_nist target different standards.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'alethia_' prefix and use snake_case, making the pattern highly predictable. However, a few names (status, screenshot, eval) are nouns or abbreviations rather than verbs, which slightly deviates from a strict verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 15 tools, the server sits at the upper boundary of a well-scoped set. Each tool addresses a distinct need in the automation workflow, though some are auxiliary (e.g., cockpit controls, demo server) and could be trimmed without losing core functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for the stated purpose: compile/preview, execute, observe (screenshot/eval), audit (WCAG/NIST), safety verification, session export, and parallel execution. There are no obvious dead ends or missing critical operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources