Spryker Package Search Tool
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_spryker_packagesB | To search the Spryker package repository in Github |
| search_spryker_package_codeB | To search code in Spryker GitHub repositories |
| search_spryker_documentation_pathC | To search Spryker documentation path urls by query |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools have distinct primary targets: documentation paths, package code, and package repository search. However, 'search_spryker_package_code' and 'search_spryker_packages' could be slightly confusing as both involve GitHub repositories, though their descriptions clarify one searches code within repositories and the other searches the package repository itself.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with the verb 'search' followed by a specific noun phrase (spryker_documentation_path, spryker_package_code, spryker_packages). This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand.
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a 'Package Search Tool' that might imply broader functionality like installing or managing packages. While the tools cover key search aspects, the limited count may restrict agent workflows, especially if additional operations like package installation or version checking are needed.
The tools provide search capabilities across documentation, code, and packages, which aligns with the server's name. However, there are notable gaps: no tools for actions like installing packages, checking package versions, or managing dependencies, which are common in package management contexts. This limits the server to read-only search operations.