Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to myosm-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing 30 tools for geocoding, routing, and OpenStreetMap data analysis. It enables AI assistants to search for locations, calculate travel routes, and perform quality assurance checks on map data.
      30
      98 npm
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      OSM-backed multimodal navigation MCP server enabling geocoding, route planning, POI discovery, and urban layout analysis. It provides a structured city graph to LLM apps without proprietary map APIs.
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides live geospatial data such as geocoding, POI search, isochrones, and area density from open data sources to LLM clients like Claude, Cursor, or Claude Code.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Free geospatial MCP server for AI agents, providing geocoding, reverse geocoding, POI search, and route planning using OpenStreetMap data via Nominatim, Overpass, and OSRM.
      1
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools overlap in purpose, particularly find_nearby_places, explore_area, and analyze_neighborhood, all of which provide comprehensive amenity profiles around a location. While descriptions hint at differences (e.g., scores for livability), an agent could easily select the wrong one. Other specific searches (parking, schools, EV stations) are clearly distinct.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names consistently use lowercase snake_case with a verb_noun structure (find_*, get_*, analyze_*, etc.). The only minor deviation is 'reverse_geocode' which is a standard term, and no camelCase or mixed conventions appear. Overall, the pattern is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 16 tools, the server is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but still reasonable for a broad OSM-based location service. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of geographic data (search, routing, utilities, transport), so the count feels appropriate rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers geocoding, reverse geocoding, POI search, routing, neighborhood analysis, map tiles, and specialized infrastructure queries (power, EV, public transport). Minor gaps exist, such as a direct tool for fetching OSM object details by ID, but core workflows are well-supported and no critical dead ends are apparent.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues