myosm-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to myosm-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn OpenStreetMap MCP server that provides location-based services including geocoding, route directions, points of interest search, and neighborhood analysis to enhance LLMs with geospatial capabilities.121MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server providing 30 tools for geocoding, routing, and OpenStreetMap data analysis. It enables AI assistants to search for locations, calculate travel routes, and perform quality assurance checks on map data.3098 npm5MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceOSM-backed multimodal navigation MCP server enabling geocoding, route planning, POI discovery, and urban layout analysis. It provides a structured city graph to LLM apps without proprietary map APIs.8-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives LLMs access to geographic data conversion tools, enabling transformations between different formats like WKT, GeoJSON, CSV, TopoJSON, and KML, as well as performing reverse geocoding.911 npm16MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides live geospatial data such as geocoding, POI search, isochrones, and area density from open data sources to LLM clients like Claude, Cursor, or Claude Code.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceFree geospatial MCP server for AI agents, providing geocoding, reverse geocoding, POI search, and route planning using OpenStreetMap data via Nominatim, Overpass, and OSRM.1GPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Several tools overlap in purpose, particularly find_nearby_places, explore_area, and analyze_neighborhood, all of which provide comprehensive amenity profiles around a location. While descriptions hint at differences (e.g., scores for livability), an agent could easily select the wrong one. Other specific searches (parking, schools, EV stations) are clearly distinct.
Tool names consistently use lowercase snake_case with a verb_noun structure (find_*, get_*, analyze_*, etc.). The only minor deviation is 'reverse_geocode' which is a standard term, and no camelCase or mixed conventions appear. Overall, the pattern is predictable and readable.
With 16 tools, the server is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but still reasonable for a broad OSM-based location service. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of geographic data (search, routing, utilities, transport), so the count feels appropriate rather than bloated.
The tool surface covers geocoding, reverse geocoding, POI search, routing, neighborhood analysis, map tiles, and specialized infrastructure queries (power, EV, public transport). Minor gaps exist, such as a direct tool for fetching OSM object details by ID, but core workflows are well-supported and no critical dead ends are apparent.