get_slot
Retrieve the current slot number on a Solana network by specifying mainnet-beta, devnet, or testnet.
Instructions
Get the current slot number
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| network | No | Solana network |
Retrieve the current slot number on a Solana network by specifying mainnet-beta, devnet, or testnet.
Get the current slot number
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| network | No | Solana network |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description implies a read-only operation by using 'Get', but it does not explicitly state safety or any behavioral traits. For a simple getter, this is adequate but minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words, achieving maximum conciseness while conveying the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a low-complexity tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description is largely complete. However, it could optionally mention that the return value is a number representing the slot.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (network parameter described as 'Solana network'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get the current slot number' clearly states the action (Get) and the resource (current slot number). It is distinct from sibling tools like get_block_height or get_epoch_info, which refer to different blockchain concepts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not provide context for when retrieving the slot number is appropriate or how it differs from other get_* tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.