Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to munim

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Gives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.) unified, secure access to dev infrastructure (Vercel, GitHub, Supabase, Cloudflare, GCP) via a single MCP token.
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Unified MCP server for DevOps engineers that provides real-time read and write access to Kubernetes, ArgoCD, Prometheus, and PagerDuty from any MCP-compatible AI agent.
    21
    107 npm
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    One MCP that turns Claude Code into your whole dev stack by swallowing other MCP servers, delegating to Codex & Gemini on your CLI subscriptions, remembering projects in a searchable knowledge graph, and carrying setup across sessions — secret-free by design.
    23
    3
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A remote MCP server that exposes tools from many services (X, LinkedIn, GitHub, Gmail, Notion, etc.) through a single endpoint on Cloudflare Workers, enabling unified access to third-party APIs via natural language.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    One secure, self-hosted MCP endpoint connecting AI agents to your real accounts (mail, calendar, files, notes), with per-profile separation, explicit permission enforcement, and an append-only audit log.
    88 npm
    35
    Apache 2.0

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 16 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: cross-client queries (ask_across_clients, find_across_clients, audit_all_clients), single-client actions (check, fix, client_status, work_on_client), provider interactions (list_provider_tools, call_provider_tool, call_provider_api), setup workflows (plan_mail_setup, apply_mail_setup), and client management (add_client, connect_provider). Overlapping tools are clearly differentiated by scope (all vs one client, specific check vs full catalogue, open-ended vs predefined).

Naming Consistency4/5

The vast majority of tools follow the verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_clients, find_across_clients, call_provider_tool, apply_mail_setup, etc.). The single exception is 'client_status', which uses a noun phrase instead of a verb-first format, but it is still unambiguous and consistent in style.

Tool Count5/5

16 tools is well-scoped for a client management and email/DNS configuration server. Each tool serves a distinct purpose without redundancy, covering discovery, diagnostics, remediation, provider integration, and workflow orchestration. The count is within the ideal 3-15 range (slightly above but justified by the breadth of functionality).

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: client creation, provider connection, status checks, health audits, targeted fixes, mail setup planning and application, and run monitoring. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit tool to delete a client or disconnect a provider, and no tool to list the check catalogue directly), but these are likely handled through other means and do not cause agent failures in core workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessResponsive