obox_fastapi_init_project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the transparency burden. It discloses the key actions: initializing a project, setting up a uv environment, and installing fastapi[standard]. While it does not detail side effects like overwriting or network requirements, it provides meaningful behavioral context beyond the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded, with the primary purpose stated in the first sentence. The Args section is structured and provides necessary details without unnecessary verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main functionality and all parameters, and an output schema exists so return details are omitted. It lacks explicit preconditions (e.g., whether the path must be empty) but is adequate for a project initialization tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has no parameter descriptions (0% coverage), but the description's Args section explains both parameters: path is an absolute path, and python_version is the Python version with a default of '3.12'. This fully compensates for the schema's lack of semantic detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the tool's function: 'Initializes a new FastAPI project at the specified path.' It also details the setup steps (uv environment, FastAPI installation), making it distinct from sibling tools like react_init_project.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for FastAPI project initialization but does not explicitly mention when to use it versus alternatives or provide exclusions. Usage context is inferred from the tool name and description rather than stated directly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.