Skip to main content
Glama
vinayvobbili

resume-kit-mcp

by vinayvobbili
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to resume-kit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • resumeforge

      Vishu-ak
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Turns any AI assistant into an ATS-optimized resume engine that tailors resumes to job descriptions, validates candidate intake, analyzes gaps, scores matches, and renders DOCX/PDF outputs.
      9
      MIT

    • Resume Tailor MCP Server

      priyanshu-arya
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to tailor a resume to any job description by extracting keywords, analyzing gaps and ATS compliance, managing versions, and compiling PDF/LaTeX outputs entirely locally without external API keys.
      MIT

    • WebMCP

      ubaydullayevgiyosiddin7-eng
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to work inside a resume workspace where it can search job postings and propose edits grounded in user-recorded facts, while the interface constrains its tools and requires human approval before any change or application is prepared.
      9 npm
      MIT

    • career-fit-assistant

      andreak3779
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to run deterministic job-application workflows—fit-checking job descriptions, generating gap analyses, resumes, cover letters, LinkedIn/GitHub copy, and learning-plan PDFs—while refusing document generation when skill match is below Good.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions: list_versions (enumerate), show_version (preview text), build_version (render files), check_facts (guardrails), score_version (job matching), application_answers (form data), ats_playbook (reference). There is mild conceptual overlap between show_version/build_version (both produce the resume) and between check_facts/score_version (both validate against requirements), but the descriptions distinguish internal guardrails from external scoring well enough.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Five of seven tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (list_versions, show_version, check_facts, build_version, score_version). The remaining two (application_answers, ats_playbook) are noun phrases rather than verb-led, a minor deviation that still reads clearly.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a resume-tailoring workflow, and each tool maps to a distinct step (list, preview, validate, build, score, form answers, ATS guidance). No redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the consume/validate/build/score lifecycle plus application-form and ATS support, which is strong for the stated purpose. The main gap is authoring: there is no create/update/delete for versions or content, so resume editing must happen outside the server (implied by the 'content directory' model), a minor workaround.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources