Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenRouter MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that functions as an intelligent gateway for multiple LLM backends including OpenAI, Claude, and Ollama. It supports automatic provider fallback, streaming responses via Server-Sent Events, and real-time monitoring for robust AI integration.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server offering hybrid memory recall and continuity tools for AI agents. It also provides a governance gateway that pre-approves risky shell/file/git actions before execution.
      19
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables agents to dynamically switch between multiple AI models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.) with unified protocol-driven configuration and capability discovery.
      Apache 2.0
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A sophisticated MCP server providing advanced memory capabilities with RAG, hallucination detection, and enterprise-grade AI infrastructure for intelligent agent ecosystems.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools have overlapping chat generation purposes (chat_completion, chat_with_preset, chat_ensemble, chat_routed) but descriptions distinguish them by mode. Code search tools (search_symbols vs semantic_code_search) and indexing tools (index_project vs reindex_project) are also similar, though their intents are clear enough.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_models, get_balance, pin_context). Minor deviations like chat_with_preset (preposition) and chat_routed (past participle) are understandable but break the strict pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 24 tools, the server is on the heavy side. It bundles unrelated domains (OpenRouter chat, code indexing, memory, error correlation) into one surface, which feels over-scoped for a single MCP server.

    Completeness4/5

    Core OpenRouter operations (chat, models, budget, usage) are well covered. The supplementary features (indexing, memory) have CRUD-style operations, though delete for indexing and some model detail endpoints are missing. Overall, most workflows can be completed.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues