API MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to API MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes via URIs and tools.125 npm8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system with resources, tools for creating notes, and prompts for summarization.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server implementing a simple notes system with resources, tools for creating notes, and prompts for summarization.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server implementing a simple notes system with resources, tools, and prompts.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes.12517 npm3MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes.23-
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
The HTTP methods (get, post, put, delete) are clearly distinct, but auth_login and clear_user/list_user overlap in user/token management, which could cause confusion. The descriptions help clarify, but there is some functional overlap in the authentication tools.
The HTTP methods use simple verbs (get, post, put, delete), while the user/token tools use verb_noun patterns (auth_login, clear_user, list_user). This mixed convention is readable but inconsistent, with no uniform pattern across all tools.
With 7 tools, the count is well-scoped for an API server covering core HTTP operations and basic authentication management. Each tool has a clear purpose, and the number is neither too sparse nor excessive for the domain.
The toolset covers essential HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) and basic authentication lifecycle (login, list, clear), but lacks advanced features like token refresh or error handling. Minor gaps exist, but agents can work around them for most API interactions.