Skip to main content
Glama
Restaurant Ops MCP

Restaurant Ops MCP

by vikstas

Related Servers

Alternatives to Restaurant Ops MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to analyze CSV files by providing statistical analysis and structural summaries via MCP tools.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes Qloo taste-graph analysis of a restaurant's audience as MCP tools, letting existing agents retrieve a restaurant's entity, cross-domain affinities, over-indexing dishes and vibes, and demographic skew, or generate a fully verified weekly playbook of menu moves, events, and campaigns. Enables agents to ground restaurant decisions in Qloo evidence with affinity scores and an evidence ledger.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for analyzing CSV files from your filesystem, particularly suited for chatbot conversation logs. Allows listing, reading, filtering, merging, and statistical analysis of CSV data via natural language.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools operate at different granularities: one calculates metrics for a single item, while the other parses and analyzes a full menu CSV. There is minor conceptual overlap because both compute contribution margin, but the input format and output scope are sufficiently distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names use snake_case and follow a verb_noun pattern (calculate_menu_item_metrics, analyze_menu_csv). The convention is consistent and readable throughout.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server name implies broader restaurant operations, but only two narrow menu-economics tools are provided. While the pair covers single-item and batch analysis, the surface feels thin for the stated scope.

    Completeness4/5

    For menu economics, item-level and menu-level contribution analysis covers the core workflow. Minor gaps exist around period comparisons, pricing scenarios, or export/reporting, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessSyncing