Skip to main content
Glama
vikcena01

continuity

by vikcena01
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to continuity

Related Servers

  • KeepGoing MCP Server

    keepgoing-dev
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Provides AI coding assistants with persistent project memory by capturing development checkpoints during git commits, branch switches, and inactivity. It enables seamless task resumption through tools that retrieve session history, momentum, and synthesized re-entry briefings.
    44 npm
    3
    MIT

  • MCP Memory Server

    keleshteri
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Gives AI coding assistants persistent memory, safety controls, and project awareness by tracking coding sessions, protecting critical files from modifications, and managing approval workflows with automatic changelog generation.
    19
    21 npm
    MIT

  • AgentBridge MCP

    frograiny
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to persist and resume shared working state—tasks, progress, decisions, commands, tests, checkpoints, and handoffs—backed by SQLite while keeping Git authoritative for files and repository state.
    MIT

  • Stateark

    Askrion
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Saves the current state of a project — decisions, rejected approaches, open questions and the actual files — and hands it to any new chat, so you never re-explain a project twice. Local-first: everything is written to your own disk as plain Markdown and JSON, with no account and no telemetry.
    84 npm
    2
    Elastic 2.0
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 13 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target a distinct claim type or action, with record_constraint/decision/rejection/open/mission clearly scoped by their descriptions. The main ambiguities are record_open acting as a catch-all for four different item kinds (question, risk, milestone, next action) and capture partially overlapping with the individual record_* tools, though it is explicitly positioned as a batch reconciliation entry point.

Naming Consistency4/5

The record_* family gives a strong consistent prefix for append operations, and most other tools use verb_noun snake_case like resume_context, search_claims, freeze_claim, and list_projects. The outliers are 'capture' as a bare verb and 'why' as a question word, plus a slight singular/plural mismatch between freeze_claim, resolve_claim, and search_claims.

Tool Count5/5

At 13 tools, the surface is well-scoped for a persistent project-memory domain: every tool addresses a distinct part of the lifecycle including record, batch, query, freeze, resolve, explain, and project management. No tool feels redundant, and the count stays inside the ideal range.

Completeness5/5

The set covers the full lifecycle: project initialization, recording constraints, decisions, rejections, open items, and missions; batch capture with deduplication and conflict handling; freezing; resolving and archiving; and historical explanation. The append-only model deliberately omits destructive updates, but superseding via capture and unfreezing via resolve_claim fill those gaps without missing operations.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources