Skip to main content
Glama
vigneshachar283

inboxvalid-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to inboxvalid-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides email verification, returning valid, invalid, or risky status with detailed checks and metadata. It enables verifying email addresses via a simple tool interface.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes an email verification tool, returning verdicts of valid, invalid, or risky with reasons.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides email verification, bulk list cleaning, and signup risk assessment tools. It exposes three typed tools for agents: verify_email, clean_email_list, and assess_signup_risk, with real DNS MX checks and disposable domain detection.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides email verification as an MCP tool, checking format, disposable domains, and mail server availability with structured results.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a mock email verification tool over stdio transport, providing structured JSON results with statuses valid, invalid, or risky.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to validate email addresses and send emails via SMTP with zero external dependencies.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion or misselection. The tool's purpose is unambiguous and clearly defined.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool name 'verify_email' follows a clear verb_noun pattern that matches its functionality. With only one tool, consistency is trivially maintained.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has a single tool, which feels thin but aligns with its narrow scope of email verification. The minimal count is borderline but not inappropriate given the focused domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool covers all key aspects of email verification—syntax, disposable-domain, and MX checks—and always returns a structured result. There are no obvious gaps within the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues