record-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to record-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to validate candidate data pipelines against a trusted reference, running deterministic checks and returning evidence reports through MCP.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to validate MCP servers, skills, extensions, and packages for schema, security, functional, and semantic quality directly from their MCP client.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables automated regulation-change remediation by analyzing eCFR redlines, validating obligations, mapping code impact, running canary checks, and generating evidence packs for pull requests.1MIT

Vaikora Guard MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnforces deterministic policies on AI agent tool calls, evaluating actions against compliance modules (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, etc.) and returning ALLOW, BLOCK, or CONSTRAIN decisions with an audit trail.MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server that automates financial compliance audits by combining LLMs with structured analysis, enabling policy validation, risk profiling, and automated reporting.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to trace regulatory rule changes to affected parties and required actions through deterministic safety gates, returning dated action plans and hash-linked evidence records. Supports 12 MCP tools over stdio or streamable HTTP for source comparison, obligation decomposition, scope assessment, planning, and evidence validation across multiple domain packs.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: check_trace vs. check_trace_chain differ by single- vs. multi-trace scope, list_rules vs. get_rule differ by list vs. detail, and list_frameworks covers a separate catalog entity. There are no overlapping or indistinguishable tools.
All tool names use snake_case with a leading verb (check/list/get) and clear object nouns. check_trace_chain is a predictable extension of check_trace, and there are no mixed naming conventions.
Five tools fit the checker/catalog purpose well: two validation entry points and three catalog lookup tools. Each tool earns its place with no filler or obvious thinness.
The surface covers single-trace checking, chain checking, rule listing/detail, and framework discovery, which are the core operations for a RECORD compliance checker. Remediation and regulatory context are also exposed through the validation and rule tools, leaving no obvious dead ends.