client_unmuteChat

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It simply restates the tool name ('Unmute the chat') without mentioning any side effects, permissions, or state changes. This adds no transparency beyond what the name implies.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no superfluous words. It is appropriately concise for a simple tool, and the information it does convey is clear and direct.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that this is a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It fails to explain the role of `chatId` (which is not required in the schema) or how this tool relates to `client_muteChat` and other chat actions. More contextual detail would be needed for an agent to use it confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both `sessionId` and `chatId` having descriptions in the schema. The tool description adds no parameter information, but the baseline is 3 due to high schema coverage. No additional meaning is provided beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Unmute') and the resource ('the chat'), which matches the tool name. It distinguishes from the sibling tool `client_muteChat` by indicating the opposite action. Despite being terse, it leaves no ambiguity about the primary purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that it is the inverse of `client_muteChat` or suggest any context such as re-enabling notifications. There are no explicit when/when-not or alternative references.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.