Trade Surveillance Support MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| parse_email_inquiryA | |
| search_sql_configsA | |
| search_java_codeA | |
| execute_java_reportA | |
| rebuild_metadata_indexA | |
| generate_response_summaryB | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap. The tools cover different stages of a workflow: parse_email_inquiry for input analysis, search_sql_configs/search_java_code for resource discovery, execute_java_report for execution, generate_response_summary for output formatting, and rebuild_metadata_index for maintenance. An agent can easily distinguish between them based on their specific functions.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case naming. The verbs are clear and descriptive (execute, generate, parse, rebuild, search), and the nouns precisely indicate the target resource or action. There are no deviations in naming conventions across the six tools.
Six tools is well-scoped for a trade surveillance support server. Each tool serves a distinct purpose in the workflow, from inquiry parsing to report generation and response formatting. The count is neither too thin nor bloated, providing comprehensive coverage without redundancy.
The toolset covers the core trade surveillance workflow effectively: parsing inquiries, searching for relevant configurations and code, executing reports, and generating responses. A minor gap exists in direct data manipulation or validation tools (e.g., validate_trade_data, update_config), but agents can work around this using the existing search and execution tools. The surface supports end-to-end processing without dead ends.