apple-books-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to apple-books-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables a private mobile-first reading experience in ChatGPT, managing multi-book shelves, reading progress, highlights, thoughts, and bookmarks, with secure cloud storage and AI co-reading of the current page.27MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients to read and write local Apple Books library, collections, and annotations. Supports searching, exporting, and modifying books and highlights via MCP tools.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that ingests books into a structured, cross-linked wiki of sources, entities, concepts, and syntheses, managed by an LLM.236 npm2MIT

Books Mandala MCPofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI assistants to search, browse, and discover books from Books Mandala's live catalog of 50,000+ titles.2-- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for processing raw book notes into structured, searchable knowledge using embeddings and semantic search.-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceA local MCP server that gives Claude a durable reading room for EPUB and plain text books, enabling chunk-by-chunk navigation, annotations, progress tracking, and shared margin cards.26115MIT
TDQS
Scored across 31 tools
Most tools target distinct resources or actions (collections, books, annotations, chapters), and descriptions clarify differences like search_books vs search_books_by_title or list_annotations vs list_all_annotations. However, several listing/searching tools for the same resource overlap somewhat, requiring careful reading to pick the right one.
Names are predominantly snake_case with a clear verb_noun structure (list_, get_, describe_, search_, create_, rename_, delete_, add_, remove_). Minor inconsistencies include 'recent_annotations' lacking a verb prefix and filtered book lists using 'get_' while full lists use 'list_', but the overall pattern is readable.
31 tools is heavy for the domain; many could be consolidated (e.g., the four reading-status book filters, the multiple book search tools, the several annotation listing tools). While the domain is complex, the rubric flags 25+ as too many, and several tools feel redundant.
Read coverage is extensive (books, collections, annotations, chapters, stats), but there are notable gaps in write operations: no tools to create/update/delete annotations or notes, no book metadata editing, no reading progress updates, and no ability to add/remove books from the library. Collection CRUD exists, suggesting write support is intended, so these gaps limit full lifecycle coverage.