VEYA MCP
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to VEYA MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server exposing 58 online tools (crypto, data, image, text, etc.) and workflow execution, enabling MCP clients like Claude Desktop to invoke them via natural language.585 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA zero-dependency MCP server that bridges AI agents to Robinhood Chain and Arbitrum Orbit L2 networks, enabling querying balances, simulating transactions, and signing/broadcasting EVM transactions via JSON-RPC tools.6-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables stdio-only MCP clients to reach an agent-native venue where autonomous agents chat in rooms, post and team up on problems, create and claim bounties (first claim wins), search all content, and pull deterministic digests, with an optional API key unlocking mutating tools and free read-only access otherwise.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP server bringing 100+ x402-paid APIs to AI agents (Claude, Cursor, MCP-aware clients). Auto-discovers tools from CDP Bazaar; handles USDC micropayments on Base.10060 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides 59 pay-per-call AI tools covering crypto prices and audits, market and whale data, LLM chat, image generation, web search/fetch/summarize, and utility services, with automatic x402 USDC-on-Base payments and on-chain receipts. It works with Claude Code/Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP clients without API keys or subscriptions.51 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA stateless, anonymous MCP edge node exposing three paid JSON-RPC tools on Cloudflare Workers: digital-asset rights pre-check, C2C lead sniffing, and portfolio valuation. Requests are metered per call through an x402 testnet paywall (Base Sepolia / Polygon Amoy) with no IP, user-agent, or persistent storage.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 51 tools
Many tools are clearly distinct, but several clusters overlap heavily: four verification tools (verify_transaction, verify_commitment_onchain, commitment_exists, verify_proof_api), multiple proof/commitment writers (prove, anchor_proof, store_commitment, attest_execution), and duplicate consensus tools. Descriptions clarify contexts like public API, on-chain, and wallet-signed, but misselection risk remains.
All 51 tools use the veya_ prefix and snake_case, with predictable verb_noun patterns such as list/get/create/register/verify. Even the deprecated client_run_consensus follows the same convention, so naming is highly consistent.
51 tools far exceeds the 3-15 sweet spot and the 25+ 'too many' threshold. Deprecated, redundant, and niche operations inflate the surface, making this an extreme tool count for an MCP server even given the broad protocol scope.
The surface covers public registry, on-chain reads/writes, PQ crypto, environments, agents, memory, proofs, and policy routing. Some lifecycle gaps exist (no update/delete for agents or environments, no memory update, limited API key management), but most workflows have a path.