Skip to main content
Glama
Soumit MCP Server
by vext-ma

Related Servers

Alternatives to Soumit MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search Moroccan public tenders, inspect consultation dossiers, check regulatory compliance under Décret n° 2-22-431, analyze competitor awards and market barometers, and audit submission checklists.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes French and EU public procurement data (BOAMP + TED) as MCP tools for AI agents, enabling search for tenders, awards, and winner intelligence via typed filters.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables access to Chile's government procurement data (Mercado Público / ChileCompra) via MCP, allowing AI agents to query public procurement information.
      388 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and analyze Costa Rica's public procurement (SICOP) data, including supplier profiles, market trends, product price histories, and bid comparisons, through a suite of MCP tools.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to search, retrieve, analyze, and export India's Government e-Marketplace bid data through tools, resources, and prompts.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources/actions (tender search vs. details vs. compliance vs. checklist). A few pairs are close — search_competitor_awards vs. get_company_profile both return award history, and get_execution_audit_trail vs. verify_evidence_chain both deal with proof/audit — but descriptions distinguish micro (company/contract) from macro and verification from logging.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case and verb-first (search_, get_, check_, submit_, verify_, execute_, audit_), giving a predictable pattern. VERB selection varies meaningfully with action; audit_submission_checklist is a minor noun-phrase deviation but still verb_noun readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools sit comfortably in the well-scoped 3-15 range. Each tool maps to a distinct procurement workflow stage (search, analyze, comply, verify, execute), so none feel padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: discovery, tender details, competitor/buyer/company intelligence, compliance, submission checklist, execution, recourse, and audit/evidence verification. Minor gaps like deadline/alert monitoring or direct bid submission exist but core agent workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues