vba_sheet_metal

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, leaving the description responsible for behavioral disclosure. It says 'Generate VBA' but does not clarify whether it writes code to a file, inserts into a macro, or is safe/read-only. The generative nature implies no destructive side effects, but this is not explicitly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

At 7 words, the description is overly terse. It lacks critical context and would benefit from additional information about the tool's output and parameter relationships.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (7 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description is insufficient. It does not address return values, prerequisites, or how the generated VBA integrates with other tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only 43% of parameters are described in the schema; the description adds no additional parameter meaning. For parameters like 'kFactor' and 'reliefType', the agent must infer usage. The description does not compensate for the low schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Generate VBA for sheet metal operations', which includes a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'vba_advanced_features' by focusing on sheet metal, though it could be more precise about the operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'generate_vba_script' or 'create_feature_vba'. The description lacks context on appropriate use cases or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.