Pirsch Analytics MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Pirsch Analytics MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with Plausible Analytics data to query traffic, visitors, engagement, and more using conversational questions.41MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceExposes Rybbit Analytics as MCP tools for querying site traffic, page views, visitor sessions, and live visitor counts through natural language.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for the Pirsch Analytics API that lets users list domains and query traffic, pages, events, and other analytics metrics through conversational agents.3121MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying Google Analytics 4 data using natural language through MCP clients like Claude and Cursor, supporting 200+ dimensions and metrics for traffic, user behavior, and e-commerce analysis.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides read access to Plausible Analytics data with natural-language date resolution, enabling users to query analytics like 'yesterday' or 'last week' without needing to know exact date formats.8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying Plausible Analytics data for website statistics, traffic, engagement, and conversions through natural language, with support for filters, dimensions, and time-series.6-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct concern: listing domains, querying a metric, enumerating filter options, and comparing periods. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
All tools follow a consistent 'pirsch_verb_noun' pattern (list_domains, query_statistics, list_filter_options, compare_periods). The naming style is uniform and predictable.
Four tools is well-scoped for a read-only analytics server. Each tool covers a necessary high-level operation without unnecessary bloat or redundancy.
The set covers the core read-only needs: domain discovery, metric querying, filter exploration, and period comparison. A minor gap is the lack of a more comprehensive report endpoint, but the available tools can be combined to cover most scenarios.