Get EDD Stats by Date Preset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states the tool's purpose without disclosing behavioral traits such as whether it returns raw counts/revenue values, any side effects (likely none), or data freshness. Minimal disclosure beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single 14-word sentence that is front-loaded with the key information. Every word serves a purpose, no fluff or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with two required, fully-described parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate. It covers the tool's purpose and scope. However, it omits any mention of the return format or example, which would be helpful but not strictly necessary given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% as both 'type' and 'date' parameters have clear descriptions in the schema. The description merely reiterates 'preset date filter', adding no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'earnings or sales statistics', and the specific scope 'using a preset date filter'. It differentiates from siblings like 'edd_get_stats_by_date' and 'edd_get_stats_by_product' by focusing on presets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for quick preset date filters but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'edd_get_stats' or 'edd_get_stats_by_date'. No 'when not to use' or comparison with siblings is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.