Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
KRF_API_KEYNoOptional API key from data.go.kr for accessing Korean grants (KRF/NRF). Without it, NSF and ERC still work; Korean grants return empty.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
search_grantsC

Search research grants across NSF (US), ERC (EU), KRF/NRF (Korea) by keyword, PI name, or institution. Returns grant titles, award amounts, PIs, and institution info.

get_grant_detailC

Get full detail of a specific grant by ID from NSF, ERC, or KRF.

list_upcoming_deadlinesC

List upcoming grant application deadlines within the next N days across NSF, ERC, KRF funding programs.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.3/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_grant_detail retrieves specific grant details by ID, list_upcoming_deadlines focuses on deadlines within a time window, and search_grants performs keyword-based searches across multiple criteria. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_grant_detail, list_upcoming_deadlines, search_grants) with clear, descriptive verbs and nouns. The naming is uniform and predictable, enhancing usability without any deviations in style.

Tool Count4/5

Three tools are reasonable for a grant information server, covering key operations like retrieval, deadline listing, and searching. However, the scope might feel slightly thin, as additional tools for filtering or managing grant data could enhance completeness, but the current count is well-scoped for basic functionality.

Completeness3/5

The tools cover core read-only operations for grant information, including detail retrieval, deadline tracking, and searching. Notable gaps include the absence of update, delete, or creation tools, which limits the server to querying only, and there are no tools for managing user preferences or notifications, which could be useful in this domain.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues