Criar pedido V2

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only mentions that writes are allowed via the ELEVOR flag, but does not disclose side effects, idempotency, validation behavior, or any potential failures. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries full burden and it is severely insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very brief, but it lacks substance. While it is concise (no fluff), it omits critical details that make the tool usable. The structure is a single sentence with a requirement note, which is not well-organized for an API tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of an order creation operation, the description is extremely incomplete. It does not mention return values, error scenarios, required inputs, or any business rules. There is no output schema, and the description fails to provide any contextual information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'pedido' is an object with no defined properties in the schema. The description does not explain what fields or structure the 'pedido' should have. Schema coverage is 0% and the description does not compensate at all.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'cria' (create) and resource 'pedido' (order), which is a clear action. However, it does not distinguish this tool from sibling 'pedido_ecommerce_criar', both creating orders, and provides no specific scope. The mention of 'Ren9veCommerce V2' is vague and does not clarify the exact intent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool instead of alternatives like 'pedido_ecommerce_criar' or 'pedido_status'. The note about ELEVOR_ALLOW_WRITES is a prerequisite, not a usage context. Completely lacks any when-to-use or when-not-to-use information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.