get_orientation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds value beyond the readOnlyHint annotation by specifying the return values (LANDSCAPE or PORTRAIT). It does not contradict any annotations. While it doesn't disclose additional behavioral traits like auth needs or side effects, the annotation already covers the read-only nature, and the return clarification is helpful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise and front-loaded, containing only essential information. Every word serves a purpose with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema, annotations present), the description fully covers what the tool does and what it returns. It is complete for the agent to understand its purpose and outcome.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With zero parameters and 100% schema description coverage, the baseline is 4. The description does not need to add parameter information since there are none. It correctly implies that no inputs are required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves the current display orientation with specific possible values ('LANDSCAPE' or 'PORTRAIT'). It uses a specific verb ('get') and resource ('display orientation'), distinguishing it from sibling tools that deal with windows, elements, or other properties.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage as a simple query for orientation, but does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives, nor does it provide exclusions or prerequisites. For a straightforward read-only tool, the implied usage is adequate, but lacks explicit guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.