Skip to main content
Glama
verisoft-ai

windows2-mcp

by verisoft-ai

Related Servers

Alternatives to windows2-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for driving any Windows app through five layers including OCR, UI Automation, and direct OS operations. Enables AI agents to control Windows desktop and OS cursor-free, even on background/locked windows.
      63 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agents to automate Windows WPF apps with semantic UI Automation selectors, screenshots, recording, and FlaUI test generation.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to automate Windows desktop applications through window manipulation, image recognition, OCR, keyboard/mouse simulation, and memory operations via the MCP protocol.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents human-like control over Windows via visual perception and simulated mouse and keyboard input, enabling automation of any application without APIs.
      43 npm
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to control Windows by clicking, typing, and navigating with a visible cursor overlay, using a layered approach (native UIA, browser CDP, pixel fallback) for reliable interaction.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 87 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is overlap between window management tools (maximize_window vs maximize_current_window, similar for minimize and restore) which could cause confusion. Also, analyze_screen and find_by_vision serve similar visual analysis needs, though their descriptions clarify different use cases.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tools use a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., find_element, click_element, get_text). However, a few tools break the pattern, such as switch_to_window_by_title (longer than necessary) and the use of 'and' in click_and_drag. Overall, the naming is predictable with minor inconsistencies.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 87 tools, the server covers an immense amount of functionality for Windows application automation. While each tool seems justified by the complexity of the domain, the count is at the high end and could be overwhelming. Some advanced input tools (advanced_click, perform_actions, click_and_drag) might benefit from consolidation.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers a comprehensive range of actions: session management, element finding, interaction, window handling, keyboard/mouse input, UIA patterns, and file operations. Notable gaps are minimal, such as the lack of a direct tool for taking a full screenshot (only element screenshot and screen recording available) and the IE-only context switching tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues