Skip to main content
Glama
verdixapi

verdix

Official
by verdixapi
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to verdix

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SENTINEL

      teodorofodocrispin-cmyk
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Agent-Level Transaction Safety Oracle. Before an AI agent signs a blockchain transaction, it returns a SAFE/UNSAFE verdict with a SENTINEL Score (AAA-D) and risk flags. Pay-per-call $0.005 USDC via x402 on Base.
      1
      -

    • address-intel-api

      TKtokyo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides counterparty risk checks for any EVM address, returning malicious-history flags, tiered risk scoring, and plain-language summaries via x402 payment.
      -

    • x402-btc-radar

      gaodongmei478
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to call pay-per-call x402 endpoints on Base mainnet using the caller's own USDC wallet, covering single and batch token risk checks, the latest BTC radar signal, project info, and a free health probe. Payments are EIP-3009 signed with a configurable per-call spending cap, and any quote with an unexpected payee, network, or asset is refused before payment.
      MIT
    • AgentRisk MCP by Neurobyteio

      AgentRisk MCPofficial

      Neurobyteio
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents on Base to call a check_token_risk tool before trading, providing honeypot detection, LP-lock verification, brand impersonation checks, and live sell simulation across Uniswap V2/V3/V4 and Aerodrome with a clear risk score and should-trade decision.
      1
      2 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    check_address_risk takes a tier parameter and is functionally identical to the three pinned tier variants (quick, standard, deep) and largely overlaps lite. The descriptions explicitly acknowledge this equivalence, but four+ tools that reach the same verdict for the same address still create real misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use consistent snake_case with a predictable check_address_risk_<tier> family plus get_pricing. The base tool omits the tier suffix, a minor deviation, but overall the pattern is clear and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Six tools is a reasonable scope for a single-purpose screening service. However, the four near-duplicate risk-check tools inflate the count where one parameterized tool plus get_pricing would suffice.

    Completeness4/5

    The domain is EVM/Base address screening, and the surface covers the lite→deep tiers plus pricing disclosure and payment config, which fits the stated purpose. Gaps like batch/multi-address screening or other chains exist but are minor for the declared scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources