Skip to main content
Glama
veoery

GH_mcp_server

by veoery
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to GH_mcp_server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • rhino-gh-spatial-mcp

      emmaruyiyang
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for spatial reasoning and performance evaluation in Rhino/Grasshopper. It reads scenes into a spatial graph, computes geometric metrics like south-facing area and shape factor, and runs an evaluate-adjust-recompute loop via existing rhinomcp geometry commands.
      MIT

    • cadkit

      saltyeg
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for parametric part modeling in Onshape, producing fully-defined, variable-driven sketches and features. It enables LLMs to create editable CAD models using semantic selection and geometrically grounded constraints.
      33
      MIT

    • Forge

      yuvitbatra
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that enables AI agents to create and edit parametric CAD models through natural language, using a validated operation graph that compiles to real geometry.
      1
      MIT

    • Local MCP for SketchUp

      dtzhlq
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local, offline MCP server that enables AI agents to collaborate with SketchUp for controlled modeling, editing, and review tasks via 41 MCP tools.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but 'execute_grasshopper_code' is ambiguous because it executes Python code, not Grasshopper code, potentially causing confusion with other Grasshopper-related tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern, which is consistent. However, 'execute_grasshopper_code' is misleading as it executes Python code, not Grasshopper code, slightly breaking the semantic consistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server covers core Grasshopper and Rhino operations without being excessive. Each tool serves a clear function within the expected scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set lacks creation and modification capabilities for Rhino objects and components. Missing tools for creating new geometry, saving files, or deleting objects, which are essential for a complete workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources