Каталог российского ПО (каталогпо.рф)
Related Servers
Alternatives to Каталог российского ПО (каталогпо.рф)
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Russia's Chestnyi Znak product labelling system, allowing AI assistants to query marking codes, documents, warehouse balances, and participant data via natural language.1045 npm2-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP-сервер, дающий Claude (и любому MCP-клиенту) доступ к БДУ ФСТЭК — российской базе данных угроз безопасности информации.44MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for RAG-based search over 1C Enterprise configuration documentation, enabling natural language queries to find objects like справочники, документы, and отчеты.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for searching and analyzing 1C enterprise metadata and BSL code using a SQLite backend. Enables querying configuration structure, code routines, and performing compliance checks via natural language.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that reads product data from Russian and Chinese marketplaces (Wildberries, Ozon, Yandex Market, Avito, etc.) — prices, availability, ratings, reviews, and seller details — with price comparison across sources. Requires no API keys; some sources use your Chrome session for anti-bot access.4098MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLook up Russian companies by INN (tax ID) from Claude Desktop, Cursor or any MCP client: full company card, multi-year financials from official tax filings, bankruptcy and state-inspection history, trademarks and sanctions lists. Works without an API key — the anonymous free tier is enabled by default.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: get_featured_russian_software retrieves highlighted homepage products, list_russian_manufacturers focuses on vendors with product counts, and search_russian_software performs full-text catalog searches. The descriptions explicitly differentiate their use cases, eliminating any ambiguity.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_featured_russian_software, list_russian_manufacturers, search_russian_software) with clear, descriptive verbs aligned to their actions. There are no deviations in naming conventions or styles.
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a registry/catalog server, potentially limiting functionality. While the tools cover key discovery tasks, more operations (e.g., detailed product lookups or filtering) could enhance completeness. The count is borderline but not severely mismatched.
The tools provide good coverage for discovery and search in a Russian software registry, including featured items, manufacturer listings, and full-text search. However, there are minor gaps, such as no direct tool for retrieving detailed information on a specific product by ID, which agents might need to work around using search results.