dualsphysics-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dualsphysics-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAutomates Ansys Fluent simulation workflows, enabling environment checks, case execution, UDF management, and result export through MCP tools.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAutomates OpenFOAM CFD simulations via MCP, enabling AI agents to mesh, run, and post-process cases from natural language prompts without any API keys.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides aerodynamic analysis tools through MCP, enabling geometry generation, meshing, CFD solving, and visualization for 2D airfoils.7-

Ansys CFX-MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Ansys CFX through PyCFX, supporting natural-language-assisted CFX-Pre, CFX Solver, and CFD-Post workflows for setup, execution, and postprocessing.7344 PyPIApache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceVoice-driven CFD MCP server that enables natural language setup, execution, and analysis of OpenFOAM simulations, with results exportable to ParaView.16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables evidence-first CAE automation on Windows through local MCP servers for FreeCAD, Elmer FEM, and ParaView, supporting validated workflows from CAD to simulation and post-processing with a shared safety and evidence runtime.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct stage of the DualSPHysics workflow (environment check, case generation, execution, polling, conversion, measurement, validation). No overlap in purpose; even validate_dambreak and measure_tool are clearly separated (measure produces CSV, validate analyzes it).
Mostly consistent snake_case with verb_noun pattern (validate_dambreak, check_environment, run_case, measure_tool). Minor deviations: partvtk and gencase lack underscores, and job_status is noun_verb rather than verb_noun, but overall the pattern is predictable and readable.
Seven tools cover the entire simulation lifecycle for a focused domain (dam-break validation). The count is well-scoped and each tool clearly earns its place; no bloat or deficiency.
The core workflow is covered end-to-end: generate case, run solver, monitor status, measure quantities, validate against experiment, and visualize results. Minor gaps include lack of job restart/cancel and no handling of wave generation, but these are acknowledged limitations rather than missing essential steps for the stated dam-break use case.