Skip to main content
Glama
vegetableno1

dualsphysics-mcp

by vegetableno1

Related Servers

Alternatives to dualsphysics-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Automates OpenFOAM CFD simulations via MCP, enabling AI agents to mesh, run, and post-process cases from natural language prompts without any API keys.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Ansys CFX through PyCFX, supporting natural-language-assisted CFX-Pre, CFX Solver, and CFD-Post workflows for setup, execution, and postprocessing.
      7
      344 PyPI
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Voice-driven CFD MCP server that enables natural language setup, execution, and analysis of OpenFOAM simulations, with results exportable to ParaView.
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables evidence-first CAE automation on Windows through local MCP servers for FreeCAD, Elmer FEM, and ParaView, supporting validated workflows from CAD to simulation and post-processing with a shared safety and evidence runtime.
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage of the DualSPHysics workflow (environment check, case generation, execution, polling, conversion, measurement, validation). No overlap in purpose; even validate_dambreak and measure_tool are clearly separated (measure produces CSV, validate analyzes it).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Mostly consistent snake_case with verb_noun pattern (validate_dambreak, check_environment, run_case, measure_tool). Minor deviations: partvtk and gencase lack underscores, and job_status is noun_verb rather than verb_noun, but overall the pattern is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools cover the entire simulation lifecycle for a focused domain (dam-break validation). The count is well-scoped and each tool clearly earns its place; no bloat or deficiency.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow is covered end-to-end: generate case, run solver, monitor status, measure quantities, validate against experiment, and visualize results. Minor gaps include lack of job restart/cancel and no handling of wave generation, but these are acknowledged limitations rather than missing essential steps for the stated dam-break use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues