wishlist_remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses that the operation mutates the wishlist and that indices are 1-based relative to wishlist_list, but it does not mention what happens to remaining entries after removal or invalid-index behavior. 'Remove' conveys destructiveness but not complete side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the action and packs the essential scoping detail. Every word earns its place with no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter tool with an output schema, the description is sufficient. It states what is removed, how the target is identified, and where the index comes from. No critical calling information is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the schema only states that 'index' is an integer. The description adds the critical semantics: the index is 1-based and refers to positions from wishlist_list. It does not specify bounds or error behavior, but the core meaning is well covered.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Remove' and names the exact resource ('wishlist entry') plus the selection mechanism ('1-based index from wishlist_list'). This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like wishlist_add and wishlist_check.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly ties the index to wishlist_list, signaling that the agent should obtain the index from that command first. It does not spell out exclusions or when not to use it, but the context is clear enough for a single-purpose removal tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.