reaper-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to reaper-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server that enables AI assistants to control REAPER DAW for mixing, mastering, MIDI composition, and full music production workflows with 130 tools.17654MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets language models interact with the Reaper DAW1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for controlling REAPER digital audio workstation from natural language. It enables AI agents to create tracks, import audio, adjust mix parameters, and manage sessions through typed operations and a REAPER bridge.22-
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to control REAPER DAW via the Model Context Protocol, including track, FX, MIDI, and audio operations.4782MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to create fully mixed and mastered tracks in REAPER DAW, supporting project management, MIDI composition, audio recording, and mixing automation.5892 PyPI130MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables users to control and edit REAPER projects through a Python-based interface and a Lua bridge. It supports managing tracks, controlling transport, manipulating MIDI and audio items, and adjusting FX parameters within the digital audio workstation.57GPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 40 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action on a specific resource (e.g., transport_play vs transport_pause, fx_add vs fx_list). Even the two info tools (reaper_info, reaper_status) serve different diagnostic purposes. No ambiguity or overlap exists.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun or domain_verb_noun pattern with underscores (e.g., track_add, fx_set_param, transport_stop). The only outlier is install_bridge, but it still follows the verb_noun convention. No mixing of styles.
With 40 tools, this server is well beyond the typical 3-15 range for a well-scoped server. While REAPER is a complex DAW, the granularity could be reduced (e.g., combining transport tools into a single tool with actions). The high count makes it heavy for an MCP server.
Core operations for tracks, FX, transport, and items are covered, but notable gaps exist (e.g., deleting markers/regions, editing MIDI notes beyond adding, managing sends/receives). The run_reascript tool partially mitigates this by allowing arbitrary code, but the dedicated tool surface is incomplete.