Skip to main content
Glama
SiteAudit MCP

SiteAudit MCP

by vdalhambra

Related Servers

Alternatives to SiteAudit MCP

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Provides AI agents with real-time financial market intelligence including stock quotes, crypto data, technical analysis, and portfolio insights. Enables natural language queries for current prices, technical indicators, asset comparisons, and portfolio analysis.
    17
    9
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to run SEO audits and use site tools for meta tags, robots.txt, schema validation, SERP previews, Core Web Vitals, Open Graph, hreflang, Search Console, GA4, keywords, and backlinks via the Model Context Protocol.
    160 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to perform instant SEO audits, check robots.txt, sitemaps, and AI crawler access for any URL without API keys.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Provides AI-visibility scoring and site auditing capabilities for websites, enabling agents to check how sites appear in AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, run full SEO/security audits, and monitor changes over time.
    15
    257 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Lets any AI agent audit any website for SEO, GEO/AEO, and speed problems, reporting issues and recommendations without modifying the site.
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Scans a website to score its compatibility and safety for AI agents, and exposes an audit tool via the Model Context Protocol.
    103 npm
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 11 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Most tools target distinct audit areas, but 'full_audit' overlaps with individual audits like 'seo_audit', 'performance_audit', and 'security_audit'. Also, 'compare_sites' and 'competitor_gap_analysis' serve similar competitive analysis purposes, causing potential confusion.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tool names use snake_case and are descriptive. However, some follow a 'verb_noun' pattern (check_links, check_robots_txt) while others use 'noun_verb' (accessibility_audit, security_audit), which is a minor inconsistency.

Tool Count5/5

With 11 tools, the server covers a comprehensive set of site auditing capabilities without being bloated. Each tool addresses a specific need, and the count is appropriate for the domain.

Completeness4/5

The server covers major audit areas like accessibility, performance, SEO, security, links, and structure. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated mobile-friendliness check or sitemap validation, but Lighthouse and other tools partially fill these gaps.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive