Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to gwagent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control Android devices via ADB, providing tools for screen capture, tap/swipe/input, app management, and diagnostics. Works locally over USB or WiFi and integrates with MCP clients like Claude and Cursor.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables full Android control from any AI agent via 7 MCP tools, including screen capture, touch interaction, app management, and system control.
      25 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to perceive and control an Android phone through tools for screenshots, visible text and coordinates, app/screen queries, taps, swipes, text input, key events, app launching, and interrupt/resume, closing the perception-action loop.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Drive an Android phone over ADB and expose it to AI agents via MCP, enabling natural language-driven interaction for native app testing.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI assistants to see and control Android devices through ADB and a fast device-control protocol, including screenshots, touch input, typing, app management, UI inspection, file transfer, shell commands, and audio/video streaming.
      154 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 156 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Tools are grouped by domain and mostly distinct, but many near-neighbors require close reading, such as calendar_respond vs calendar_rsvp, calendar_sync vs calendar_sync_background, gmail_move vs gmail_label, and gmail_delete_forever vs gmail_empty. Descriptions clarify most boundaries, but the large surface creates real misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case with a clear domain prefix (calendar_, drive_, gmail_, ui_, device_, app_), giving predictable grouping. The pattern is not strictly verb_noun throughout—several names are noun/state-oriented such as drive_location, gmail_compose_state, and calendar_calendars—but consistency is mostly maintained.

    Tool Count1/5

    At 156 tools, this is far beyond the well-scoped 3-15 range and exceeds the 50-tool threshold for extreme mismatch. Even though the server spans multiple app domains, the surface is too large to navigate efficiently as a coherent tool set.

    Completeness5/5

    Coverage across Gmail, Calendar, Drive, UI automation, and device control is extensive, including CRUD, sharing, labels, drafts, sync, tasks, and escape hatches. No obvious dead ends are apparent; unsupported edge cases can generally be reached through device_shell.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues