task_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the auto-classification behavior when the level is missing, which goes beyond the annotation flags (all false). However, it does not mention side effects, permissions, error modes, or what happens in the 'van' phase—leaving significant behavioral aspects unexplained.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence and technically concise, but the 'v8.0:' version prefix adds noise without value. The cryptic 'van' term and lack of elaboration make it feel under-specified rather than efficiently structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is too terse to provide sufficient context. It does not explain what the 'van' phase means, what 'level' classification entails, or what the expected outcome is. With no output schema and minimal context, the tool is not adequately described for correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has three parameters (task_id, description, level) with no descriptions. The description only references 'level' in relation to auto-classification, and does not explain what task_id or description represent. With 0% parameter coverage, the description only minimally compensates.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('start a task') and a condition ('auto-classifies level if missing'), which makes the core purpose clear. However, the phrase 'van phase' is cryptic and may confuse, though it is still distinguishable from sibling tools like classify_task or phase_transition.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The mention of auto-classification gives an implicit hint, but there is no explicit direction or context for choosing this over similar sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.