Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
AGENTABLE_TOKENYesJWT token from seo4agent.com
AGENTABLE_BASE_URLNoAPI base URLhttps://seo4agent.com

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
audit_urlA

Audit a website for AI/agent readiness. Returns a readiness level (0-5), score percentage, and individual check results. Level 5 = Autonomous (fully agent-ready), Level 0 = Hostile. Free plan: 5 audits/day. Pro: unlimited.

bulk_auditA

Audit multiple websites at once (up to 50). Returns a summary table with level and score for each URL. Requires Pro subscription.

compare_urlsA

Compare websites side by side for agent readiness. Free plan: up to 2 URLs. Pro plan: up to 8 URLs. Returns scores and check results for each URL.

get_leaderboardA

Get the public leaderboard of top agent-ready websites. No authentication required.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a clearly distinct workflow: single URL audit, bulk audit, side-by-side comparison, and leaderboard access. Even though bulk_audit and compare_urls both handle multiple URLs, their descriptions differentiate summary output from comparative analysis.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern: audit_url, compare_urls, get_leaderboard. bulk_audit is a minor deviation since it reads as an adjective-noun phrase rather than an action-object pair, but the overall style remains coherent and readable.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is well-scoped for this niche server. Each tool covers a distinct user need without unnecessary redundancy, and the count matches the apparent purpose of auditing and comparing agent readiness.

Completeness4/5

The core audit lifecycle is covered: single, bulk, comparison, and public leaderboard operations. Minor gaps exist, such as no historical audit retrieval or detailed report export, but agents can complete primary workflows without dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues