OVB3 Bridge
Related Servers
Alternatives to OVB3 Bridge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA local, zero-dependency MCP server to author, lint, deploy, and debug Workato recipes from Claude. It wraps the Workato Developer REST API, RLCM package API, and Data Tables record API with 56 tools.56-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA local MCP server that bridges Claude Desktop/Cowork to the Azure DevOps CLI, enabling full use of az devops, az repos, az boards, az pipelines, and az artifacts commands.12-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that connects Claude Desktop to an Oracle Fusion Cloud instance. It exposes suppliers, purchase orders, invoices, and project costs as callable tools.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides comprehensive access to Salesforce Tooling API for metadata management, SOQL queries, code analysis, and debugging through Claude and other AI assistants.31 npm5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for integrating coding agents (Claude Code CLI, etc.) with the GIMS Automation system. Enables development of automation scripts, data source types, activator types, and Git synchronization.61MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that gives Claude direct access to Workday Studio workspace. Enables reading, writing, planning, and validating integration assemblies without network calls or tenant credentials.-
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: repo listing, artifact CRUD, git operations, build/audit, and VBCS/VB Studio REST calls are all clearly separated. Even similarly named tools like list_apps and vbcs_list_applications are distinguished by their local vs remote scope.
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (list_repos, read_artifact, run_build), and the git_*, vbcs_*, and vbstudio_* prefixes provide meaningful grouping. However, git_* tools use a noun_verb style (git_status, git_commit) that deviates from the primary pattern, slightly reducing overall consistency.
At 19 tools, the server is slightly above the typical 3-15 well-scoped range, but the breadth covers local repo management, build tooling, and two distinct remote APIs. The three [NOT IMPLEMENTED] tools add to the count without contributing functionality, but the overall scope justifies the number.
The core bridge workflows are covered: get local repo status, commit/pull/push, read/write artifacts, build, and interact with standalone VBCS apps. However, the VB Studio integration is entirely unimplemented, and there are no artifact delete/update operations or BO data mutation, leaving notable gaps for a comprehensive bridge.