get_task_comments
Retrieve all comments for a specific task by providing the task ID.
Instructions
Get all comments for a specific task
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | Yes |
Retrieve all comments for a specific task by providing the task ID.
Get all comments for a specific task
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; the description only says 'Get all comments', indicating a read operation. It lacks details on behavior like ordering, pagination, or whether it includes nested replies.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it could benefit from a bit more structure to front-load critical info.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite being a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description does not explain what the return value contains or any error conditions, leaving gaps for an AI agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has one parameter (taskId) with 0% description coverage. The description does not add meaning beyond the parameter name, failing to compensate for the lack of schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get all comments for a specific task' clearly states the verb (Get) and the resource (comments for a task), distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_task_comment or get_document_comments.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., get_document_comments). The context is implied but not stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/vaizcom/vaiz-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server