Skip to main content
Glama
vaddisrinivas

olivetin-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to olivetin-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server exposing scoped, read-only enterprise operations tools with fail-closed credential handling. It returns opaque approval IDs for mutations and requires a separate operator approval command to release one-time capabilities.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides a security gateway for AI agents, enforcing allow/confirm/deny policies on tool calls and requiring human approval for risky operations, with full audit logging.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gates agent tool calls by normalizing intent, denying unknown/unattended destructive actions, and requiring HITL prove approval for high-risk operations. It maintains an append-only hash-chained Action Ledger and exposes gate_check and ledger_verify tools without ever executing tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A least-privilege enforcement proxy for MCP servers. It sits between MCP clients and upstream servers, enforcing tool policies, hiding denied tools, requiring human approval for risky actions, and providing a structured audit trail.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides human-in-the-loop approval for risky AI agent actions, with durable state and audit logs.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The core OliveTin tools are mostly distinct, but the inclusion of unrelated tools (brave_search, render_diagram, render_chart) creates confusion about the server's purpose and could lead to misselection. There is also mild overlap between get_execution_logs and get_execution_status, though descriptions help clarify.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., list_olivetin_actions, get_execution_status, kill_action). Minor exceptions like whoami, readyz, and brave_search deviate from the pattern but are still recognizable and don't cause significant inconsistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 18 tools, the set is on the heavier side. The 15 OliveTin-specific tools are reasonably scoped for the domain, but the three unrelated utility tools pad the count and make the server feel less focused.

    Completeness4/5

    The OliveTin surface covers the core lifecycle: listing/getting actions, starting/killing/restarting, status/logs, approvals, entities, validation, user/server info, health, and reload. Minor gaps include lack of entity mutations and synchronous action start, but these are not critical for typical workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues