Skip to main content
Glama
vaayne

omni-fs-mcp

by vaayne

Related Servers

Alternatives to omni-fs-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides unified access to multiple cloud object storage services (Huawei OBS, Alibaba OSS, AWS S3, MinIO) enabling AI assistants to list, search, retrieve, and manage unstructured data across different storage providers.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables unified access to both structured databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, etc.) and unstructured object storage (AWS S3, Alibaba OSS, Huawei OBS, etc.) through a single interface.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides file system access and operations, enabling AI assistants to read, write, list, search, and manage files and directories through a standardized interface.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides a standardized way to interact with MinIO object storage, allowing access to text files, binary files, and bucket contents while supporting operations like listing buckets/objects, retrieving objects, and uploading files.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A multi-backend gateway that enables access to various services like Google Drive and Notion through a single MCP connector. It currently provides comprehensive Google Drive integration for reading, writing, and managing files and folders.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: file reading, writing, copying, renaming, listing, directory creation, and backend management. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., write_file, list_backends), making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 13 tools, the server covers both file operations and backend management comprehensively without being bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    The file operations cover most CRUD but are missing a delete file tool, which is a significant gap for a file system server. Backend management seems complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues