Skip to main content
Glama

Estado de la sesión

educa_status
Read-only

Check whether the Educa browser is open, a session is active, which page is current, and which configuration file is in use.

Instructions

Indica si el navegador está abierto, si hay sesión en Educa, la página actual y qué fichero de configuración se usa.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "educa_status"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, consistent with a pure status probe, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the specific state fields it inspects, but says nothing about output format, what happens when the browser is closed or no session exists, or whether the check has side effects such as launching a browser.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that front-loads the browser-state check and lists the remaining reported facts in a natural order, with zero filler. Nothing is repeated from the title or annotations.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description must carry the return-value burden, and it does enumerate the four pieces of state returned. It falls short only on format and edge-case behavior (e.g., no config file found, browser not installed), which are minor for a no-arg status tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description correctly implies the call needs no input and returns ambient state, adding nothing that would mislead about arguments.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific diagnostic verb ('Indica') and enumerates the exact state it reports: browser open/closed, Educa session presence, current page, and active config file. That is enough to distinguish it from action-oriented siblings like educa_login or educa_navigate, though no sibling is named explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit statement of when to call this versus alternatives, and no prerequisites or exclusions are given. Usage is only implied: by reporting browser/session/page state it reads as a pre-flight or troubleshooting check, but the agent must infer that.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.