Chrome Browser Control
Related Servers
Alternatives to Chrome Browser Control
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-driven browser automation from any MCP client by pairing with a Chrome extension, translating tool calls into WebSocket commands to drive Chrome without an Electron host.1,791 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables browser automation over MCP using a real Chrome browser with existing profile, supporting real tabs, downloads, cookies, and RPA workflows.107 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables remote AI agents to control a local, authenticated desktop browser over MCP through an outbound WebSocket bridge and Chrome extension, supporting tab management, navigation, page reading, clicking, typing, scrolling, screenshots, and JavaScript evaluation.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables local opencode agents to control a live Chrome browser via MCP tools, including tab management, JavaScript execution, clicking, form filling, page reading, screenshots, and console log retrieval.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables ZCode to control a real Chrome browser, including tabs, navigation, page content, clicks, form filling, keyboard input, scrolling, screenshots, and JavaScript evaluation through a local MCP bridge.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables remote agents to control a local Chrome/Edge browser via MCP, supporting navigation, snapshots, clicks, typing, screenshots, and script execution.56 npmISC
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Several tools overlap significantly: snapshot, visible_snapshot, query_elements, extract_elements, and page_status all provide ways to inspect page content/state; click, click_at, and perform_actions (with click steps) overlap in interaction; browser_status and page_status both report status but with different focus. The descriptions are detailed but the high-level purposes blur together.
Tool names are predominantly verb_noun (e.g., list_tabs, navigate, click_at), but there is inconsistency in verb style: some use explicit verbs like 'browser_status' (noun-only), 'cdp_attach' (abbreviation), 'snapshot' (noun-only), and 'keypress' (verb-noun but single word). Also 'extract_feed_posts' is more domain-specific than the rest.
30 tools is on the high end for a browser control server. While the domain is complex, many tools feel like slight variations of each other (e.g., snapshot vs visible_snapshot), making the count feel bloated. The server could be consolidated to around 20 tools without losing functionality.
The tool set covers well the lifecycle of controlling a browser: claiming tabs, navigating, interacting, snapshotting, waiting, extracting, and CDP network inspection. Missing basic operations like page reload, back/forward, or download management are minor gaps that agents can work around.