Skip to main content
Glama
v4t0r

Nextcloud ChatGPT Bridge

by v4t0r
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Nextcloud ChatGPT Bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SpaceDock

      starlove7
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT to securely control remote development servers over OAuth-protected MCP, exposing workspace-bounded tools for file editing, command execution, Git operations, and running Codex or GitHub Copilot subagents.
      18 npm
      MIT

    • Codex Local Bridge

      yiwancibeishang123
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects the ChatGPT web app to a locally running Codex agent over OAuth-secured MCP so users can plan in chat while their own machine reads authorized project files, applies SHA-guarded edits, and runs sandboxed tests. Per-project grants can be revoked anytime, and every write is backed up, conflict-checked, and audited.
      MIT

    • C2C Bridge

      G0K0U
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents like Codex to use the ChatGPT web app as a planning and review brain, letting ChatGPT read only needed code via OAuth MCP and submit locally authorized tasks without API keys or repository uploads.
      4
      MIT

    • chat-with-hermes

      00000linlin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT web to read local files, search code, run shell commands, and drive a local Codex CLI via an official MCP connector, with human approval for risky commands and full audit logging.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    File operations are clearly separated by action and by text-vs-binary (read_text_file vs download_file_base64, write_text_file vs upload_file_base64). The three discovery tools (get_nextcloud_capabilities, get_nextcloud_app_accesses, probe_native_nextcloud_mcp) have distinct targets but their boundaries are subtler for an agent. No dangerous overlap among the core file tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All 14 tools use consistent snake_case with meaningful action verbs (list_, get_, read_, write_, upload_, download_, create_, move_, delete_, search_, probe_). The only minor inconsistency is the redundant 'nextcloud' prefix in some metadata tool names (get_nextcloud_capabilities, get_nextcloud_app_accesses, probe_native_nextcloud_mcp) while others omit the domain.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the ideal range and each tool maps to a distinct file-management or metadata operation. The surface is neither bloated nor thin for a private workspace bridge.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle is covered: list/search/info, read text/binary, write/upload, create_folder, move/rename, delete. The notable gap is share management — list_nextcloud_shares exists but there is no create/delete share, so sharing workflows dead-end after reading. Minor and workable via other apps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources