Skip to main content
Glama
v4t0r

Nextcloud ChatGPT Bridge

by v4t0r
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Nextcloud ChatGPT Bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • C2C Bridge

      G0K0U
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents like Codex to use the ChatGPT web app as a planning and review brain, letting ChatGPT read only needed code via OAuth MCP and submit locally authorized tasks without API keys or repository uploads.
      2
      MIT

    • C2C Bridge

      czstudio
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT Pro web to securely read workspace files, git diffs, and test records through OAuth-protected read-only MCP tools, so it can plan and review while Codex handles execution without uploading the repository.
      MIT
    • PC FileBridge by gexiro-global

      PC FileBridgeofficial

      gexiro-global
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT, Codex, and compatible MCP clients to read bounded UTF-8 text and create files or directories in operator-selected folders, with strict protections against overwrites, deletes, and path escapes.
      Apache 2.0

    • dev-mcp

      Crasnec
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A self-contained Docker Compose deployment that exposes MCP tools for files, shell commands, background processes, and Git operations, enabling ChatGPT to work with a host directory via OAuth authentication.
      MIT

    • local-drive-mcp

      sofakingmc0804
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling ChatGPT to interact with local filesystem via controlled file operations like read, write, edit, and search, with configurable guardrails for safety.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools address distinct resources/actions (capabilities, app access, file ops, shares), but get_nextcloud_capabilities, get_nextcloud_app_accesses, and probe_native_nextcloud_mcp all concern bridge/native capability discovery and could be confused if descriptions are skimmed. The file tools are clearly distinct: list/search/get/read/write/upload/create/move/delete.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_files, create_folder, delete_file), but there is minor inconsistency between get_ prefixed tools (get_nextcloud_capabilities), bare verbs (read_text_file, write_text_file), and descriptive verbs (probe_native_nextcloud_mcp, download_file_base64). Still predictable and readable overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the ideal range for a file-management bridge with additional introspection. Each tool covers a concrete, non-redundant operation; none feel like padding.

    Completeness4/5

    File lifecycle is well covered: list, search, read, write, upload, download, create, move, delete, and metadata. Missing share management (only listing) and lack of a direct 'exists' endpoint (though get_file_info covers it), but these are minor gaps for the bridge's apparent scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources