Skip to main content
Glama
v4t0r

Nextcloud ChatGPT Bridge

by v4t0r

Related Servers

Alternatives to Nextcloud ChatGPT Bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT to securely control remote development servers over OAuth-protected MCP, exposing workspace-bounded tools for file editing, command execution, Git operations, and running Codex or GitHub Copilot subagents.
      35 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents like Codex to use the ChatGPT web app as a planning and review brain, letting ChatGPT read only needed code via OAuth MCP and submit locally authorized tasks without API keys or repository uploads.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT web to read local files, search code, run shell commands, and drive a local Codex CLI via an official MCP connector, with human approval for risky commands and full audit logging.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT Pro web to securely read workspace files, git diffs, and test records through OAuth-protected read-only MCP tools, so it can plan and review while Codex handles execution without uploading the repository.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT, Codex, and compatible MCP clients to read bounded UTF-8 text and create files or directories in operator-selected folders, with strict protections against overwrites, deletes, and path escapes.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools address distinct resources/actions (capabilities, app access, file ops, shares), but get_nextcloud_capabilities, get_nextcloud_app_accesses, and probe_native_nextcloud_mcp all concern bridge/native capability discovery and could be confused if descriptions are skimmed. The file tools are clearly distinct: list/search/get/read/write/upload/create/move/delete.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_files, create_folder, delete_file), but there is minor inconsistency between get_ prefixed tools (get_nextcloud_capabilities), bare verbs (read_text_file, write_text_file), and descriptive verbs (probe_native_nextcloud_mcp, download_file_base64). Still predictable and readable overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the ideal range for a file-management bridge with additional introspection. Each tool covers a concrete, non-redundant operation; none feel like padding.

    Completeness4/5

    File lifecycle is well covered: list, search, read, write, upload, download, create, move, delete, and metadata. Missing share management (only listing) and lack of a direct 'exists' endpoint (though get_file_info covers it), but these are minor gaps for the bridge's apparent scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues