Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to uxlint

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Audit any website for privacy, security, accessibility, and performance issues — with scores, grades, and actionable fix instructions. No account required.
      3
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Design review for UI code, inside your coding agent. Reviews React, Vue, Svelte, CSS and SwiftUI against 313 rules and returns scored findings with file:line fixes your agent can apply and verify.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Point your coding agent at a URL and get a real-browser QA audit: broken signup/login/checkout flows, JS console errors, missing analytics, consent + security headers, mobile tap targets, and accessibility — returned as machine-verified findings graded A-F.
      44
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to conduct UX reviews of web applications, detecting and fixing AI-generated design and usability issues while preserving the original style.
      18
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Scans live web pages and single-page apps across multiple viewports to detect WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility violations and returns concrete, browser-verified fixes grounded in WCAG success criteria and techniques.
      5
      364 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables automated WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility audits of Figma designs and webpages. Generates detailed markdown reports with severity-grouped violations, specific criterion references, and concrete fix recommendations.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct phase of the UX lint workflow: guidance, audit creation, report retrieval, screenshot viewing, and fix verification. Even though audit_url and get_report both return findings, one kicks off a new audit while the other reads an existing report, so there is no realistic confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Audit_url, get_shot, get_report, and verify_fix all follow a clear verb_noun pattern. ux_guidance breaks that pattern as a noun_noun name, but it is still readable and does not undermine the overall consistency of the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped size for a UX auditing tool: guidance, audit, report, screenshot, and verify each earn their place. There is no redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full loop: read guidance, audit a page, retrieve an existing report, view visual evidence, and verify fixes. The optional lint_feedback tool is explicitly conditional and therefore not a real gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive