No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a distinct role in the audit workflow: running audits, reading reports, viewing screenshots, verifying fixes, acknowledging findings, and getting design guidance. While audit_url and get_report both surface findings, one initiates a run and the other retrieves an existing one, and the descriptions make this boundary clear. No two tools appear interchangeable.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (acknowledge_finding, get_report, get_shot, verify_fix), with audit_url fitting the same style. The sole deviation is ux_guidance, a noun phrase with a ux_ prefix, which breaks the pattern slightly but remains readable and unambiguous.
Six tools cleanly cover the core loop of guidance, audit, inspect, verify, and acknowledge. Nothing feels redundant or missing at this scale, and the set is well-scoped for a focused UX linting server.
The surface covers the main lifecycle: read guidance, run an audit, retrieve reports, view evidence, verify individual fixes, and acknowledge false positives. A list_reports tool for discovering existing report IDs without already having a URL is a minor missing convenience, but most workflows are fully supported.
