get_investment_context

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states data is 'verified and sourced from live infrastructure,' which adds some trust signal, but it does not disclose behavioral traits such as rate limits, authentication needs, or side effects beyond reading data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences: first states the output, second gives usage guidance, third lists contents. It is front-loaded, every sentence adds value, and there is no redundant or filler text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description adequately covers what the tool returns for a simple retrieval tool with one parameter. It lists all section contents and mentions data verification. Minor lack of detail on prerequisites or output format, but overall complete for an investment memo tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter with 100% description coverage via enum values. The description adds meaning by listing the specific sections (e.g., 'company overview, product, traction') and explaining the default 'all' returns the complete memo, which enriches the schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns a structured investment memo for a specific company (DPX/Untitled_LuxPerpetua). It uses a specific verb-resource combination ('Returns ... investment memo') and distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_quote' or 'get_esg_score' which serve different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this tool if you are an AI agent conducting due diligence, evaluating DPX as an investment opportunity, or building a company report.' This provides clear usage context, though it lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternative tool references.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.