get_smart_collection

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It implies a read operation by stating 'Get full details' but does not explicitly confirm it is non-destructive or require authentication. The phrase 'including its rules' adds some transparency about the response content.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that conveys the purpose without any unnecessary words or repetition. It is appropriately front-loaded and concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description gives a reasonable idea of what is returned ('full details... including its rules'). However, it could be more thorough by mentioning the return format or confirming it returns a smart collection object. The siblings list provides context but the description itself is slightly thin.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter 'collection_id' is fully described in the schema with a clear explanation. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, which is already complete. Schema description coverage is 100%, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'smart collection', and the scope 'by its ID, including its rules'. It distinguishes itself from sibling get tools like 'get_custom_collection' by specifying 'smart collection'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates you need the ID to fetch a single smart collection, but provides no guidance on when to use this versus listing tools (e.g., list_smart_collections) or other get tools. No exclusions or alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.